News reports of research into memory June 2006
For index of all headlines, go to News & Views main page
To look at research reports sorted by subject go to Research Reports
For news about Alzheimer's research go directly to the Alzheimer's page
You can find links to the journals referred to on this site here: Journal links
June 2006
Alzheimer's pathology related to episodic memory loss in those without dementia
A study of 134 participants from the Religious Orders Study or
the Memory and Aging Project has found that, although they didn't
have cognitive impairment at the time of their death, more than a
third of the participants (50) met criteria for a pathologic
diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. This group also scored
significantly lower on tests for episodic memory, such as recalling
stories and word lists. The results provide further support for the
idea that a ‘cognitive reserve’ can allow people to tolerate a
significant amount of Alzheimer's pathology without manifesting
obvious dementia. It also raises the question whether we should
accept any minor episodic memory loss in older adults as 'normal'.
The study was published in the June 27 issue of
Neurology.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/aaon-apr062006.php
Brain function not impaired by tight diabetes control and hypoglycemia
Previous research had indicated that tight blood glucose control
-- achieved by taking three or more insulin injections daily – meant
type 1 diabetics were three times as likely to suffer episodes of
severe hypoglycemia, raising the fear that it might lead to a
long-term loss of cognitive ability. Now a follow-up study provides
the reassuring news that there was no link between multiple severe
hypoglycemic reactions and impaired cognitive function in people
with type 1 diabetes.
The study was presented at the American Diabetes Association's 66th
Annual Scientific Sessions held in Washington, D.C, June 9—13.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/jdc-lss060806.php
Why are uniforms uniform? Because color helps us track objects
Laboratory tests have revealed that humans can pay attention to
only 3 objects at a time. Yet there are instances in the real world
— for example, in watching a soccer match — when we certainly think
we are paying attention to more than 3 objects. Are we wrong? No.
Anew study shows how we do it — it’s all in the color coding. People
can focus on more than three items at a time if those items share a
common color. But, logically enough, no more than 3 color sets.
The study was reported in the July issue of
Psychological Science.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/jhu-wau062106.php
Talking on a cellphone while driving as bad as drinking
Yet another study has come out rubbing it in that multitasking comes
with a cost, and most particularly, that you shouldn’t do anything
else while driving. This study demonstrates — shockingly — that
drivers are actually worse off when using a cell phone than when
legally drunk. The study had 40 volunteers use a driving simulator
under 4 different conditions: once while legally intoxicated, once
while talking on a hands-free cell phone, once while talking on a
hand-held cell phone, and once with no distractions. There were
differences in behavior —drunk drivers were more aggressive,
tailgated more, and hit the brake pedal harder; cell phone drivers
(whether hands-free and hand-held ) took longer to hit the brakes,
and got in more accidents. But in both cases drivers were
significantly impaired.
The research was published in the summer issue of
Human Factors.
Full reference
http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.htm3?article_id=218392815
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/uou-doc062306.php
http://www.guardian.co.uk/mobile/article/0,,1809549,00.html
People remember prices more easily if they have fewer syllables
The phonological loop — an important component of
working memory
—can only hold 1.5 to 2 seconds of spoken information. For that
reason, faster speakers have an advantage over slower speakers. Now
a consumer study reveals that every extra syllable in a product's
price decreases its chances of being remembered by 20%. Thus, people
who shorten the number of syllables (e.g. read 5,325 as 'five three
two five' as opposed to 'five thousand three hundred and twenty
five') have better recall. However, since we store information both
verbally and visually, it’s also the case that unusual looking
prices, such as $8.88, are recalled better than typical looking
prices.
The study will appear in the September issue of the
Journal of Consumer Research.
Full reference
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060623001231.htm
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/uocp-prp062206.php
Increasing consumer preferences by manipulating memory
In two experiments, people who had to solve an anagram before
seeing a target brand, they were more likely to claim to have seen
the brand before, and to prefer it over competing brands.
The study was published online 29 June in
Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/jws-icp062606.php
Language affects how math is done?
A comparison of activity in the brains of Chinese and English
participants doing simple arithmetic using Arabic numbers has found
that, although both groups utilised the
inferior parietal cortex
(an area connected to quantity representation and reading), English
speakers displayed more activity in the language processing area of
the brain, while Chinese speakers used the area of the brain that
deals with processing visual information. There was no significant
difference in the reaction time and accuracy of the Chinese and
English-speaking volunteers. However, an
earlier study comparing Canadian and Chinese students found that
the latter were better at complex maths. The findings suggest that
our native language, or different teaching methods, may influence
the way we solve equations.
The report appeared online before print on June 30 in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Full reference
http://www.scenta.co.uk/scenta/news.cfm?cit_id=903050&FAArea1=widgets.content_view_1
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9422?DCMP=NLC-nletter&nsref=dn9422
Language center executive organizer of action plans
Broca's area
is the region in the brain traditionally known as the ‘language
center’, however recent research has broadened that understanding.
The most recent study reveals that this region, and its counterpart
in the right hemisphere, becomes active when people are asked to
organize plans of action — an activity that we must now distinguish
from a simple action sequence, which didn’t require these regions.
These regions appear to implement a specialized executive system
controlling the selection and nesting of action segments in a
hierarchical structure of behavioral plans. This general executive
function may explain Broca’s key role in language production.
The report appeared in the June 15 issue of
Neuron.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/cp-wtb060806.php
Fat hormone linked to learning and memory
A new study reveals why obese patients who have diabetes also may
have problems with their long-term memory. Leptin — the so-called
‘fat’ hormone — doesn't cross into the brain to help regulate
appetite in obese people. Leptin also acts in the
hippocampus, suggesting that leptin plays a role in learning and
memory. The new study supports this by demonstrating that mice
navigated a maze better after they received leptin. Moreover, mice
with elevated levels of
amyloid-beta
plaques
(characteristic of Alzheimer's) were particularly sensitive to
leptin.
The research appeared in the June issue of
Peptides.
Full reference
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060614090511.htm
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/slu-alb061306.php
Face blindness is a common hereditary disorder
A German study has found 17 cases of the supposedly rare disorder
prosopagnosia (face blindness) among 689 subjects recruited from
local secondary schools and a medical school. Of the 14 subjects who
consented to further interfamilial testing, all of them had at least
one first degree relative who also had it. Because of the
compensation strategies that sufferers learn to utilize at an early
age, many of them do not realize that it is an actual disorder or
even realize that other members of their family have it — which may
explain why it has been thought to be so rare. The disorder is one
of the few cognitive dysfunctions that has only one symptom and is
inherited. It is apparently controlled by a defect in a single gene.
The study was published online June 30, 2006 in
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A.
Full reference
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/07/060707151549.htm
Prevalence of combat-related PTSD
Two large independent studies funded by the US government have
assessed the impact of the Vietnam War on the prevalence of PTSD in
US veterans. The National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study
(NVVRS) estimated prevalence to be 15.2% while the Vietnam
Experience Study (VES) estimated the prevalence to be 2.2%. A new
study explains this discrepancy by reanalyzing both data sets using
varying criteria. Prevalence estimates for combat-related PTSD of
2.5% and 2.9% for the VES and the NVVRS, respectively, were found
when a narrow and specific set of criteria were used, while
prevalence estimates 12.2% and 15.8% for the VES and NVVRS,
respectively, were found when broader and more sensitive criteria
were used.
The study was available online 2 May in BMC Psychiatry (Open Access)
Full reference
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/6/19
Skills related to early language learning
A study of more than 120 children aged 21 months — a peak time
for language learning — has found a link between language learning
and several motor and cognitive skills. Children who were poor at
moving their mouths (for example not being able to lick their lips,
or blow bubbles) were particularly weak at language skills, while
those who were good at these movements had a range of language
abilities. Children who were good at pretending that one object is
another, such as using a block for a car, or a box for a doll's bed,
or giving a doll a tea party, were also better at language, but
there was no relationship with more general thinking skills, such as
doing puzzles. Children who could say new words an adult asked them
to repeat, were best at language. Being able to listen to a new word
or a funny sound and work out which picture it went with also
distinguished between children with advanced and not so strong
abilities.
The study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
(ESRC).
Reference
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060628095606.htm
Report available at
http://tinyurl.com/qssx7
How does the bilingual brain distinguish between languages?
Studies of bilingual people have found that the same brain
regions, particularly parts of the left
temporal cortex, are similarly activated by both languages. But
there must be some part of the brain that knows one language from
another. A new imaging study reveals that this region is the
left caudate
— a finding supported by case studies of bilingual patients with
damage to the left caudate, who are prone to switch languages
involuntarily.
The study appeared in the June 9 issue of
Science.
Full reference
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/608/2?etoc
Asymmetrical brains let fish multitask
A fish study provides support for a theory that lateralized
brains allow animals to better handle multiple activities,
explaining why vertebrate brains evolved to function asymmetrically.
The minnow study found that nonlateralized minnows were as good as
those bred to be lateralized (enabling it to favor one or other eye)
at catching shrimp. However, when the minnows also had to look out
for a sunfish (a minnow predator), the nonlateralized minnows took
nearly twice as long to catch 10 shrimp as the lateralized fish.
The research was reported online 19 June in
Animal Behaviour.
Full reference
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/623/2?etoc
Primates take weather into account when searching for fruits
In recent times, a popular hypothesis for why primates, and
especially humans, have more strongly developed cognitive skills
than other mammals, is that they result from the need for complex
social skills. There is quite a lot of support for this argument.
But it is not the only possibility and a recent study has looked at
an alternative: that it evolved to deal with ecological problems,
such as foraging for food. Researchers followed a group of wild
gray-cheeked mangabeys from dawn to dusk over 210 days in their
natural rainforest habitat, obtaining an almost complete record of
their foraging decisions in relation to their preferred food, figs.
The findings are consistent with the idea that monkeys make foraging
decisions on the basis of episodic ("event-based") memories of
whether or not a tree previously carried fruit, combined with
knowledge of recent and present weather conditions and a more
generalized understanding of the relationship between temperature
and solar radiation and the maturation rate of fruit and insect
larvae.
The report appeared in the June 20th issue of
Current Biology.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/cp-ptw061406.php
Connections between neurons act as information filters in the brain
Synapses — the connections between brain cells — have long been
known to be important in information-processing, but the exact
nature of their role has not been clear. Are they a crucial part of
the processing itself, or simply part of the transport system?
Worryingly, research has suggested that synapses drop up to 90% of
all incoming signals — an unreliability difficult to reconcile with
the fact that brain as a whole is very reliable. A new study has
cast new light on synaptic activity. It turns out that synaptic
transmission is highly temperature-dependent. Previous studies had
studied isolated groups of neurons at room temperature; the present
study recorded data at wormer conditions — almost body temperature.
And revealed that excitatory and inhibitory synapses, previously
thought to always work against each other, in fact act in concert to
identify patterns carrying relevant information in an incoming
signal. As a result, meaningful patterns are amplified, and stray
noise is discarded. This provides the experimental confirmation
needed, for the view that synapses act to filter the “noise” and
makes the information processing reliable.
The report appeared in PLoS Biology.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/si-cbn060906.php
Full text available at:
http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040207


