Dyslexia: Research reports
Helping dyslexics
June 2008
Remedial instruction can close gap between good, poor readers
A brain imaging study of poor readers has found that 100
hours of remedial instruction not only improved the skills of struggling
readers, but also changed the way their brains activated when they comprehended
written sentences. 25 fifth-graders who were poor readers worked in groups of
three for an hour a day with a reading "personal trainer," a teacher specialized
in administering a remedial reading program. The training included both word
decoding exercises in which students were asked to recognize the word in its
written form and tasks in using reading comprehension strategies. Brain scans
while the children were reading revealed that the parietotemporal region —
responsible for decoding the sounds of written language and assembling them into
words and phrases that make up a sentence — was significantly less activated
among the poor readers than in the control group. The increases in activation
seen as a result of training were still evident, and even greater, a year later.
Although dyslexia is generally thought of as caused by difficulties in the
visual perception of letters, leading to confusions between letters like "p" and
"d", such difficulties occur in only about 10% of the cases. Most commonly, the
problem lies in relating the visual form of a letter to its sound.
The findings are available online in the August issue of Neuropsychologia.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/cmu-cmb061108.php
September 2007
Having right timing 'connections' in brain is key to overcoming dyslexia
New research has found that key
areas for language and working memory involved in reading are connected
differently in dyslexics than in children who are good readers and spellers.
But, after the children with dyslexia went through a three-week instructional
program, their patterns of functional brain connectivity normalized and were
similar to those of good readers. The study looked specifically at activity in
the left and right inferior front gyrus. The left inferior front gyrus may
control the communication between the different areas involved in language,
especially spoken language, while the right is thought to be involved in
controlling the processing of letters in written words. Prior to the treatment
these two areas were overconnected in the dyslexics, and the left inferior
frontal gyrus also was overconnected to the middle frontal gyrus, which is
involved in working memory that requires temporal coordination. It is not yet
known how long the improvement in connectivity is maintained.
The study was published online
August 17 in the Journal of Neurolinguistics.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-09/uow-hrt090407.php
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09116044
April 2005
New insight into brain and speech promises help for learning disabilities
Following a new
understanding of the nature of certain language dysfunctions,
researchers have devised a new non-invasive diagnostic tool called
BioMAP that can quickly identify children with a subset of learning
disabilities that results from a dysfunction in the way the
brainstem encodes certain basic sounds of speech. Such children
accounted for nearly a third of the language-disordered children the
researchers studied. BioMAP measures whether a child's nervous
system can accurately translate a sound wave into a brain wave. If
it cannot, the affected individual demonstrates problems in
discriminating speech sounds that interfere with normal learning.
Once identified, children with these problems will be able to
improve their speech discrimination skills through auditory
training.
The report appeared in the April issue of Trends in Neurosciences.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-04/nu-nii040405.htm
October 2004
Promise for helping adults with dyslexia
Recent studies
have demonstrated that children with dyslexia can benefit from
programs aimed at “retraining” the brain. Now a new study shows
that adults with dyslexia can also benefit from tutoring in
processing words, and their brains show changes that indicate neural
modifications due to the training.
The study appeared in the October 28 issue of Neuron.
Full
reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-10/cp-pfh102204.htm
November 2003
Immature motion pathways in the brain associated with poor reading skills
An interactive computer game called
MovingToRead (MTR) has significantly improved reading skills in poor
second-grade readers within three months by practicing left-right movement
discrimination for 5 to 10 minutes once or twice a week. It has been suggested
that immature motion pathways — the circuit of neurons that helps readers
determine the location of letters of a word and words on a page — may be
related to reading problems in children. The therapy appears to be most
effective with second-graders (age 7).
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-11/sfn-ssb111103.htm
July 2003
Short-term dyslexia treatment strengthens key brain regions
A group of dyslexic children and a group of good readers of
the same age underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to map their
brain activation patterns during two types of reading tests. Both groups of
children were found to use the same specific parts of their brains to perform
the reading tasks, however, the activation of these regions was much weaker in
the dyslexic children. The children with dyslexia then received a three-week
training program based on principles outlined by the National Reading Panel (http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org).
After this program the levels of brain activation were found to be essentially
the same in the two groups.
The study was published in the July 22 issue of Neurology.Full
reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-07/aaon-sdt071503.htm
More background on dyslexia including initial steps toward
identifying it in a child, how it may be treated, and additional resources can
be found in Neurology's "Patient Page" at http://www.neurology.org.
Causes of dyslexia
April 2008
Chinese and English dyslexias stem from different brain abnormalities.
Dyslexia involves impairment in connecting the sight and
sound of a word. In English, this is commonly seen in transpositions of letters,
while in Chinese, the problem can affect how a person converts a symbol into
both sound and meaning. Following an earlier study in which the brain areas
involved in dyslexia were found to be different for English and Chinese readers,
a new technique has confirmed and clarified the results. Chinese children with
dyslexia had a significantly smaller left
middle frontal gyrus than did Chinese
children without the disorder, even though both groups had the same overall
volume of gray matter. Intriguingly, this area is not associated with symbol
recognition, but with working memory. Earlier research has found
English-speaking dyslexics have less gray matter in the left
parietal region.
The findings also suggest that dyslexics in one language will probably not be
dyslexic in the other.
The study was published in the April 8 issue of the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Full reference
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080407/full/news.2008.739.html
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/408/1?etoc
May 2005
New evidence for the cause of dyslexia
A new study casts new light on the
cause of dyslexia. Recent research has tended to focus on the
magnocellular (M) pathway, one of two visual pathways in the brain
that processes motion and brightness. The other visual channel, the
parvocellular (P) pathway, processes detail and color. Although some
studies have implicated an impaired M channel, showing that dyslexic
children have trouble seeing rapidly changing or moving stimuli,
results have been inconsistent. A new study suggests that the
problem is rather a more general problem in basic sensory perception
— an inability to shut out “noise”, that is, the sounds and
patterns surrounding the target information.
The report appeared in the May 29 issue of Nature Neuroscience.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-05/uow-sso052505.htm
September 2004
Dyslexia doesn't have a universal biological cause
While most of the latest research focuses on the biological causes
of dyslexia, a new study reveals that the disorder affects the
brains of Chinese and English speakers differently, suggesting that
the neural basis of reading differs depending on the nature of the
writing system. The findings have enormous implications for helping
impaired readers in China, where 2% to 7% of children are dyslexic.
The study also highlights the importance of paying attention to
differences in languages, even languages as similar as English and
Italian. It has been shown that the degree of impairment when
reading can differ depending on the language.
The study appeared in the 2 September issue of Nature.
Full
reference
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5888011/
August 2004
Dyslexics have less gray matter in the brain's language centers
A new imaging study involving people with a family history of
dyslexia confirms earlier research suggesting dyslexics have a
significant reduction of gray matter in centers associated with
language processing. The study lends
credence to earlier studies that suggested intensive reading therapy
activates parts of the brain needed for decoding words.
The finding was published in the August 24 issue of Neurology.
Full reference
June 2004
Brain development and puberty may be key factors in learning disorders
New research suggests that the brains of
children with learning problems not only appear to develop more
slowly than those of their unaffected counterparts but also actually
may stop developing around the time of puberty's onset. In the
study, children with impairments started out about three years
behind, but their rate of improvement was very similar to that of
the children without impairments — until around 10 years, when
further development in the children with learning problems stopped.
The researchers suggest that delayed brain development and its
interaction with puberty may be key factors contributing to
language-based learning disabilities such as dyslexia. This
hypothesis suggests a completely new approach to the study of
learning problems. It also points to the importance of early
intervention.
The article appeared in the June 29 issue of the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-06/nu-bda061604.htm
December 2003
Sensory processing different in people with dyslexia
An imaging study of dyslexics has found
that dyslexic readers appear to process auditory and visual sensory cues
differently than do normal readers. In
the study 30 dyslexic readers and 30 normal readers performed three
matching tasks — an auditory task, a visual task and a multisensory task
— involving consonant-vowel pairs. During the auditory matching task the
dyslexic readers showed increased activity in the visual pathway of the
brain, while that same region deactivated in the normal readers. The
dyslexic readers' increased activation patterns in the visual pathway
corresponded to poorer performance on the matching task.
The report was presented at the 89th Scientific Assembly and Annual
Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).
Reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-12/rson-fdm112403.htm
May 2003
Imaging study confirms theory of dyslexia
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has confirmed
part of an eighty-year-old theory on the neurobiological basis of dyslexia. Dr
Orton theorized that normally developing readers learn to suppress the visual
images reported by the right hemisphere of the brain because these images
potentially interfere with input from the left. The imaging study found that
children do in fact "turn off" the right side of the visual parts of
the brain as they become accomplished readers, and also demonstrated that
different phonological skills relate to activity in different parts of the brain
when children read. This observation lends support to the theory that there may
be several neurobiological profiles that correspond to different subtypes of
dyslexia, each associated with varying deficits in one or more of these
different phonological skills.
The findings were published online on May 18 in Nature Neuroscience.
Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-05/gumc-wor051603.htm

