Brain regions involved in memory: Research reports

general

November 2006

How the brain detects novelty

New research suggests that the hippocampus makes predictions of what will happen next by automatically recalling an entire sequence of events in response to a single cue, allowing us to anticipate future events and detect when things do not turn out as expected. Rather than reacting to novelty, the hippocampus seems to act as a comparison device, matching up past and present experience.
The research is published today in Public Library of Science Biology. Full reference
The full text is available at http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040424
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-11/wt-tot112406.htm

May 2006

Master planners in brain may coordinate other areas' roles in cognitive tasks

Scans of 183 subjects have identified 3 brain areas most consistently active during a variety of cognitive tasks — the dorsal anterior cingulate and the left and right frontal operculum. It’s suggested that these regions coordinate the activities of specialized regions. In a rather lovely analogy, researchers suggested that if the brain in action can be compared to a symphony, with specialized sections required to pitch in at the right time to produce the desired melody, then the regions highlighted by the new study may be likened to conductors. Until now, the function of the opercula has been a mystery; the findings also suggest a rethinking of the role of the cingulate.
The study was published in the June 1 issue of Neuron. Full reference
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/05/060531165250.htm
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-05/wuso-mpi053006.htm

May 2005

Brain networks change according to cognitive task

Using a newly released method to analyze functional magnetic resonance imaging, researchers have demonstrated that the interconnections between different parts of the brain are dynamic and not static. Moreover, the brain region that performs the integration of information shifts depending on the task being performed. The study involved two language tasks, in which subjects were asked to read individual words and then make a spelling or rhyming judgment. Imaging showed that the lateral temporal cortex (LTC) was active for the rhyming task, while the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was active for the spelling task. The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the fusiform gyrus (FG) were engaged by both tasks. However, Dynamic Causal Modeling (the new method for analyzing imaging data) revealed that the network took different configurations depending on the goal of the task, with each task preferentially strengthening the influences converging on the task-specific regions (LTC for rhyming, IPS for spelling). This suggests that task specific regions serve as convergence zones that integrate information from other parts of the brain. Additionally, switching between tasks led to changes in the influence of the IFG on the task-specific regions, suggesting the IFG plays a pivotal role in making task-specific regions more or less sensitive. This is consistent with previous studies showing that the IFG is active in many different language tasks and plays a role in integrating brain regions.
The findings were presented in the June 1 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience. Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-06/nu-bnc060105.htm

March 2005

Primitive brain learns faster than the "thinking" part of our brain

A study of monkeys has revealed that a primitive region of the brain known as the basal ganglia learns rules first, then “trains” the prefrontal cortex, which learns more slowly. The findings turn our thinking about how rules are learned on its head — it has been assumed that the smarter areas of our brain work things out; instead it seems that primitive brain structures might be driving even our most high-level learning.
The report appeared in the Feb. 24 issue of Nature. Full reference
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2005/basalganglia.html

November 2001

Imaging study confirms role of medial temporal lobe in memory consolidation

Lesions in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) typically produce amnesia characterized by the disproportionate loss of recently acquired memories. Such memory loss has been interpreted as evidence for a memory consolidation process guided by the MTL. A recent imaging study confirms this view by showing temporally graded changes in MTL activity in healthy older adults taking a famous faces remote memory test. Evidence for such temporally graded change in the hippocampal formation was mixed, suggesting it may participate only in consolidation processes lasting a few years. The entorhinal cortex (also part of the MTL) was associated with temporally graded changes extending up to 20 years, suggesting that it is the entorhinal cortex, rather than the hippocampal formation, that participates in memory consolidation over decades. The entorhinal cortex is damaged in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
The report appeared in Nature neuroscience. Full reference
http://www.nature.com/neurolink/v4/n11/abs/nn739.html

emotion

May 2006

Why motivation helps memory

An imaging study has identified the brain region involved in anticipating rewards — specific brain structures in the mesolimbic region involved in the processing of emotions — and revealed how this reward center promotes memory formation. Cues to high-reward scenes that were later remembered activated the reward areas of the mesolimbic region as well as the hippocampus. Anticipatory activation also suggests that the brain actually prepares in advance to filter incoming information rather than simply reacting to the world.
The report appeared in the May 4 issue of Neuron. Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-05/cp-tbm042706.htm

February 2006

How emotions interfere with memory

We know emotion can interfere with cognitive processes. Now an imaging study adds to our understanding of how that occurs. Emotional images evoked strong activity in typical emotional processing regions (amygdala and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) while simultaneously deactivating regions involved in memory processing (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and lateral parietal cortex). The researchers also found individual differences among the subjects in their response to the images. People who showed greater activity in a brain region associated with the inhibition of response to emotional stimuli rated the emotional distracters as less distracting.
The findings appeared in the Feb. 15 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience. Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-02/dumc-he021506.htm

September 2005

Memory of fear more complex than supposed

It seems that fear memory is more complex than has been thought. A new mouse study has shown that not only the hippocampus and amygdala are involved, but that the prefrontal cortex is also critical. The development of the fear association doesn’t occur immediately after a distressing event, but develops over time. The process, it now seems, depends directly on a protein called NR2B.
The paper was published in the September15 issue of Neuron. Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-09/uot-sco091505.htm

February 2005

Why traumatic memories have the power they do

In the first imaging study to look at retrieval of emotional memories after a long period (one year after encoding), researchers found that people did recall emotional images, both pleasant and unpleasant, better than emotionally-neutral images. This recall was associated with higher activity in both the amygdala and the hippocampus. The synchronicity of activity between these two regions suggested that each region triggers the other, creating a self-reinforcing "memory loop" in which an emotional cue might trigger recall of the event, which then loops back to a re-experiencing of the emotion of the event. The findings suggest why people subject to traumatic events may be trapped in a cycle of emotion and recall that aggravates post-traumatic stress disorder, and may also suggest why therapies in which people relive such memories and reshape perspective to make it less traumatic can help people cope with such memories.
The paper was published online February 9 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Full reference
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-03/du-ems030805.htm